According to the Church of England, there’s simply not enough religious programming on UK television (see this BBC News article). I think that what they are actually trying to say is that there is not enough Christian television programming on British television.
It has said that we need more programming that “imaginatively marks major festivals”, and points to what it deemed a poor schedule of religious shows to mark Good Friday in 2009. Further more the original motion passed at the synod by Nigel Holmes singled out the BBC in particular , saying,
A fortnight ago the BBC announced that it was commissioning research with a view to improving the representation of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people.
Perhaps it could do the same for those who proclaim a faith.
One wonder if Mr. Holmes is referring to all those who “proclaim a faith” to have recognition in mainstream programming? Is he saying that there should be more output to reflect the broad religious makeup of Britain in the 21st Century? Is he saying that there should be programming to mark religious festivals of the major non-Christian religions? Perhaps a week of programming to mark the Hindu festival of Gancha Ganapati, or a month of programming to celebrate the Islamic festival of Ramadan? Somehow, I think this is not what he is trying to say.
What I think he is saying is that he feels that there is just not enough representation of Christianity on television, singling out the BBC in particular. Perhaps Mr. Holmes has missed Songs of Praise on BB1 every Sunday tea-time for the past, oh, nearly fifty years?!
For those of you unfamiliar with the BBC, it is a publicly funded television channel where the majority of it’s income is brought in from the compulsory purchase of a Television License for anyone able to receive television (either traditional analog, digital cable or satellite or over a computer). Additionally, the BBC (and the other four “main” channels) have certain quotas they must fulfil in respect of certain programming types (such as religious, educational, children’s entertainment, original drama).
While the synod did reject Mr. Holmes original motion and instead chose to say that it had
deep concern about the overall reduction in religious broadcasting across British television in recent years.
While not quite as scathing as Mr. Holmes original motion it is still worrying that the Church of England sees fit to attempt to hijack the BBC (and the other four channels) for it’s own gain.
They say “religious broadcasting”, they mean “Christian programming”. As one person commented on the original article,
The BBC should exist to educate and entertain, not to indoctrinate.
Rant over.
